uMaHF0G5M1jYL9t88qHEEkQggU6GJ5wTZlhvItt7
Bookmark

SEC Crypto Fundraising Plan Faces Bank Deposit Warnings and Legal Threats

The SEC's proposed crypto fundraising exemptions face bank deposit warnings, demands for clearer token rules and threats of legal challenges.

SEC crypto fundraising proposal faces opposition from community banks, investor advocates and calls for clearer digital asset regulations.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission faces competing demands over its proposed cryptocurrency fundraising exemptions, with investment managers seeking broader access to digital assets while community banks warn of potential deposit outflows and investor advocates threaten legal action.

The debate intensified as the SEC's October 20 deadline for public comments on its proposed Regulation Crypto Assets expired. Published on August 21, the proposal would allow qualifying crypto projects to raise up to $5 million over four years or $75 million annually without registering their investment-contract offerings under the Securities Act. Issuers would still have to meet disclosure requirements and comply with federal antifraud provisions.

The framework would also introduce a conditional safe harbor under which certain crypto assets could cease to be subject to investment contracts after issuers complete or permanently abandon promised essential managerial work and submit a transition report to the SEC.

Comments from asset managers, market operators, banking groups and investor advocates highlight disagreements over investor protection, regulatory authority and the potential financial consequences of easing restrictions on crypto fundraising.

Bitwise and Fund Managers Seek Clearer Token Rules

Asset manager Bitwise called for greater clarity on whether cryptocurrencies can be held in exchange-traded products, indexes and private funds. In an October 19 comment letter, the firm said investment managers face considerable uncertainty when determining whether a token remains subject to an investment contract.

Bitwise wants fund sponsors to be able to rely on issuers' public transition reports once an SEC review period expires without a challenge. It also requested protection for managers who rely on those reports in good faith if regulators later dispute an issuer's classification.

Such changes could reduce legal uncertainty surrounding the inclusion of cryptocurrencies in investment products. However, separate fund approval procedures and compliance obligations would remain applicable.

The Alternative Investment Management Association, which represents hedge funds and other alternative asset managers, also called for a broader safe harbor. It wants the proposed protections extended to investment adviser and fund regulations, alongside clearer custody requirements and resale rules for digital assets.

Hyperliquid Policy Center and Nasdaq Seek Different Changes

The Hyperliquid Policy Center wants the SEC to extend protections to crypto projects while they are still being developed, rather than making issuers wait until they complete or permanently abandon promised essential managerial work.

The advocacy group also requested more flexibility for airdrops and transition reports. It argued that requiring detailed public disclosure of legal reasoning could expose token issuers to litigation.

Nasdaq offered more conditional support for the SEC's framework. The exchange urged the agency to explicitly exclude tokenized stocks, bonds and exchange-traded fund shares from the proposed exemptions.

Nasdaq argued that tokenized versions of traditional securities should remain subject to existing registration, disclosure and trading requirements. Without that distinction, crypto platforms could receive regulatory advantages over established securities markets, according to the exchange's position.

Community Banks Warn of Potential Deposit Outflows

The Independent Community Bankers of America raised concerns that easier cryptocurrency issuance could accelerate stablecoin adoption and draw deposits away from smaller banks.

The banking association argued that expanding crypto trading and settlement activity could concentrate customer funds among stablecoin issuers, exchanges and large reserve banks. Such a shift could increase funding costs for community banks and reduce their capacity to lend.

The group cited an earlier modeled scenario estimating that stablecoin incentives could move as much as $1.3 trillion away from community banks and reduce lending capacity by approximately $850 billion. Those figures relate to a potential expansion of stablecoins, rather than a direct estimate of the SEC proposal's impact.

The association called for additional economic analysis, stricter eligibility thresholds, periodic monitoring of deposit movements and authority to suspend exemptions if significant risks emerge. It argued that regulators should assess the combined effects of crypto-friendly policies before expanding exemptions.

Investor Advocates Challenge the SEC's Authority

Public Citizen urged the SEC to abandon the proposal and resume cryptocurrency enforcement actions. The group argued that the exemptions could encourage speculative fundraising while weakening protections for retail investors.

Former SEC enforcement official John Reed Stark and Duke researcher Lee Reiners separately called for the proposal to be withdrawn, questioning whether the agency has sufficient statutory authority to establish the exemptions.

They warned that a final rule resembling the current proposal could face an immediate legal challenge. Litigation could create further uncertainty for crypto issuers seeking to operate under the new framework.

SEC Faces Decisions on Final Crypto Rules

Following the close of the comment period on October 20, the SEC must review the submissions and decide whether to revise the proposed fundraising limits, strengthen disclosure requirements or commission additional economic analysis before adopting final rules.

The outcome could determine how qualifying crypto projects raise capital and whether certain tokens can transition out of investment-contract treatment under the proposed safe harbor. If the agency proceeds without resolving objections over its legal authority, the dispute could move to federal courts, potentially delaying implementation.

source: cryptoslate 

Writer: Ethan Collins  

Crypto Journalist

Ethan Collins reports on developments across the cryptocurrency and blockchain sector. His work covers market movements, protocol updates, regulatory changes, and emerging trends in digital assets.

He focuses on presenting complex topics in a clear and accessible manner for a broad readership.

Check out other news and articles on Google News

Disclaimer:

The articles on Hokanews are here to keep you updated on the latest buzz in crypto, tech, and beyond—but they’re not financial advice. We’re sharing info, trends, and insights, not telling you to buy, sell, or invest. Always do your own homework before making any money moves.

Hokanews isn’t responsible for any losses, gains, or chaos that might happen if you act on what you read here. Investment decisions should come from your own research—and, ideally, guidance from a qualified financial advisor. Remember: crypto and tech move fast, info changes in a blink, and while we aim for accuracy, we can’t promise it’s 100% complete or up-to-date.

Stay curious, stay safe, and enjoy the ride! hoka.news