White House Crypto Summit Feb 2: CLARITY Act on the Line as Banks and Crypto Giants Clash

White House Crypto Summit Pits Bank Regulators Against Crypto Leaders as CLARITY Act Hangs in the Balance

Washington is preparing for a pivotal confrontation between traditional finance and the digital asset industry as the White House hosts a high-stakes Crypto Summit on Monday, February 2, 2026. The meeting is widely seen as a last-ditch effort to break the political and industry deadlock surrounding the CLARITY Act, the most comprehensive cryptocurrency regulation bill to reach advanced stages of the U.S. legislative process.

Organized under the direction of the White House crypto council and supported by senior officials within the Trump administration, the summit will bring regulators, lawmakers, banking executives, and crypto industry leaders into the same room. The goal is clear: determine whether the United States can finally establish a coherent regulatory framework for digital assets or remain mired in uncertainty as global competitors move ahead.

Why the CLARITY Act Matters

The CLARITY Act was introduced to resolve one of the most persistent problems in U.S. cryptocurrency policy: regulatory ambiguity. For years, crypto companies have operated under overlapping and sometimes conflicting oversight from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, with no definitive rulebook to determine which digital assets fall under which regulator’s authority.

Source: CryptosRus Official

At its core, the CLARITY Act aims to formally classify digital assets as either securities or commodities based on their structure and use case. In doing so, it would assign clear jurisdiction to the SEC or the CFTC, reduce enforcement-by-litigation, and provide long-sought legal certainty for exchanges, developers, and investors.

Initially, the bill enjoyed rare bipartisan momentum. It passed the House of Representatives and narrowly cleared the Senate Agriculture Committee by a 12–11 vote. Crypto platforms and venture investors welcomed the effort, viewing it as a necessary step to keep innovation onshore and prevent talent flight to jurisdictions with clearer rules.

That momentum stalled abruptly when a controversial provision targeting stablecoin yields entered the spotlight.

The Stablecoin Yield Clause That Changed Everything

The most contentious element of the CLARITY Act is a clause restricting crypto firms from offering yield or interest-like rewards on dollar-pegged stablecoins. The provision was added late in the legislative process, reportedly in response to pressure from banking regulators and traditional financial institutions.

Crypto companies argue that yield-bearing stablecoins are a foundational component of decentralized finance. They contend that allowing interest on stablecoins would accelerate adoption, attract global capital, and help the United States remain competitive as other regions move quickly to integrate blockchain-based payment systems.

Banks see the issue very differently. Industry groups representing regional and community banks warn that allowing stablecoin interest could siphon deposits away from traditional accounts, weakening the banking system’s funding base. They argue that interest-bearing stablecoins function too similarly to deposits without being subject to the same capital requirements or consumer protections.

This clash has become the central obstacle blocking the CLARITY Act’s final approval.

A High-Stakes Face-Off at the White House

The White House Crypto Summit is designed to force a direct confrontation between the two sides. By convening regulators, lawmakers, banks, and crypto firms together, the administration hopes to push negotiations beyond entrenched positions and toward a workable compromise.

Source: Coin Bureau

Expected attendees include major digital asset companies and industry groups such as Coinbase, Circle, Ripple, and Kraken, alongside senior banking executives and federal financial regulators.

According to sources familiar with the agenda, discussions will center on whether stablecoin yield rules can be narrowly tailored to avoid destabilizing traditional banks while preserving functionality that crypto markets consider essential.

Why Markets Are Watching Closely

The outcome of the summit could have far-reaching implications for global digital asset markets. The United States remains one of the largest crypto markets by user base, institutional participation, and capital flow. Regulatory clarity in Washington often sets the tone for policy decisions elsewhere.

Analysts suggest that favorable stablecoin rules could unlock trillions of dollars in potential deposits, accelerating crypto’s integration into mainstream finance. Clear guidance could also encourage institutional players to expand their exposure, knowing that regulatory risk has been reduced.

Conversely, failure to reach agreement could prolong uncertainty. Crypto firms may delay investment, shift operations offshore, or reduce U.S. exposure altogether. In the short term, markets could react with volatility, particularly if investors interpret the summit as a sign that regulatory clarity is still far away.

The Broader Policy Stakes

Beyond stablecoins, the CLARITY Act would shape how exchanges operate, how tokens are listed, and how enforcement actions are pursued. Supporters argue that the bill would end years of regulatory confusion that has driven innovation out of the country.

Opponents counter that moving too quickly risks embedding loopholes that could be exploited during the next market downturn. They point to past collapses as evidence that strong safeguards are necessary before granting the crypto industry broader privileges.

This tension underscores a deeper philosophical divide. Crypto firms view themselves as builders of a new financial system, while banks and regulators see the need to preserve stability within the existing one.

Signals From the Administration

White House Crypto Czar David Sacks has publicly framed the CLARITY Act as a strategic opportunity. He has argued that passing the bill could help position the United States as the “crypto capital of the world,” attracting investment and talent while setting global standards.

Administration officials have also signaled that the summit represents a final attempt to resolve the stablecoin issue without reopening the entire bill. A narrow compromise could allow the CLARITY Act to advance while leaving room for future amendments as the market evolves.

What Happens if the Summit Fails

If the White House Crypto Summit does not produce consensus, the CLARITY Act could remain stalled indefinitely. That outcome would leave crypto firms operating in a regulatory gray area, subject to case-by-case enforcement rather than clear rules.

Meanwhile, other regions, including parts of Europe and Asia, are already implementing comprehensive digital asset frameworks. Industry leaders warn that continued U.S. inaction could erode the country’s leadership in financial innovation.

Some crypto executives have hinted that prolonged uncertainty could accelerate plans to expand abroad, particularly in jurisdictions offering licensing clarity and regulatory predictability.

A Defining Moment for U.S. Crypto Policy

Whether the summit results in compromise or confrontation, February 2 is shaping up to be one of the most consequential policy moments for digital assets this year. The meeting represents a rare attempt to reconcile the interests of banks and crypto firms before legislation reaches its final stage.

For now, markets, developers, and investors are watching closely, aware that decisions made behind closed doors at the White House could shape the future of U.S. crypto regulation for years to come.

hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.