Crypto Bill Hits the Brakes as Coinbase Pulls Support and Senate Cancels Vote
U.S. Senate Halts Vote on Crypto Market Structure Bill After Coinbase Withdraws Support
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate has abruptly canceled a planned vote on a sweeping cryptocurrency market structure bill, a move that underscores the fragile consensus surrounding digital asset regulation and the growing influence of industry feedback on Capitol Hill.
The decision came after Coinbase, the largest publicly traded crypto exchange in the United States, withdrew its support for the legislation, citing concerns that key provisions could harm innovation and restrict emerging areas of the market. The cancellation represents a significant pause in Congress’s efforts to establish clearer rules for digital assets after years of debate and regulatory uncertainty.
The legislation, formally known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, was scheduled for a markup vote before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee on January 14, 2026. That vote has now been postponed indefinitely.
 |
| Source: XPost |
A Bill Designed to Clarify Who Regulates Crypto
At its core, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act aimed to answer one of the most contentious questions in U.S. crypto policy: which federal agency should regulate digital assets.
For years, the crypto industry has operated in a gray area, with overlapping claims of authority from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The bill sought to draw a clearer line between the two, classifying certain digital assets as securities under the SEC’s oversight and others as commodities regulated by the CFTC.
Supporters argued that such clarity would reduce legal risk, encourage innovation, and keep crypto development in the United States rather than pushing it overseas. Critics, however, warned that poorly drafted rules could freeze innovation or favor incumbents at the expense of smaller startups.
Coinbase’s Objections Shift the Momentum
Coinbase’s decision to withdraw support proved decisive. The company has long been one of the most vocal advocates for comprehensive crypto legislation, frequently urging lawmakers to move beyond enforcement-based regulation.
But Coinbase Chief Executive Officer Brian Armstrong said the company could not back the bill in its current form. In a public statement, Armstrong argued that certain provisions would have unintended consequences that could damage the broader crypto ecosystem.
“We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,” Armstrong said, emphasizing concerns that the legislation would effectively ban tokenized equities and impose restrictive limits on stablecoin rewards.
According to Coinbase, these measures would stifle innovation in areas where U.S. firms are already competing with overseas platforms operating under more flexible regulatory frameworks.
Why Tokenized Equities and Stablecoins Became Flashpoints
Two elements of the bill emerged as particular sticking points.
First, provisions addressing tokenized equities, which allow traditional stocks to be represented and traded on blockchain networks, raised alarms within the industry. Critics said the rules could effectively prohibit such products in the U.S., even as similar offerings gain traction in Europe and other regions.
Second, limits on stablecoin rewards were seen as a blow to a rapidly growing segment of digital finance. Stablecoins are widely used for payments, trading, and settlement, and many platforms offer yield or rewards linked to their use. Coinbase argued that overly restrictive rules would undermine legitimate business models without meaningfully improving consumer protection.
These objections resonated with several lawmakers, prompting the Senate Banking Committee to delay the markup rather than push forward with a bill that lacked broad industry backing.
A Setback, but Not the End of the Road
The cancellation of the vote represents a setback for lawmakers who have spent months negotiating the bill. However, some policy analysts see the delay as an opportunity rather than a failure.
“Bad regulation can be worse than no regulation,” said one former financial regulator familiar with the discussions. “This pause gives Congress time to reassess and fix provisions that could have locked in unintended consequences.”
By postponing the vote, lawmakers open the door to revisions that could better balance investor protection with innovation, a balance that has proven elusive in crypto regulation.
Industry Reaction: Relief Mixed With Frustration
Reaction within the crypto industry has been mixed. Some companies expressed frustration that yet another attempt at legislative clarity has stalled. Others welcomed the delay, arguing that flawed rules could have caused lasting damage.
Market observers noted that investor reaction was relatively muted, with some traders interpreting the pause as potentially bullish. In their view, the removal of near-term regulatory risk could give the market breathing room, particularly if revised legislation ultimately proves more favorable.
Major outlets including CoinDesk and Bloomberg reported broad industry pushback in the days leading up to the canceled vote, underscoring how divided stakeholders remain on the best path forward.
The Political Challenge on Capitol Hill
The episode highlights the political complexity of crypto regulation in Washington. Lawmakers face pressure from multiple sides: consumer advocates calling for stronger safeguards, financial institutions seeking clear compliance pathways, and crypto companies pushing for flexibility to innovate.
Within Congress, views on crypto continue to vary widely. Some lawmakers remain skeptical of the industry following high-profile collapses and fraud cases. Others see digital assets as a strategic technology that the U.S. cannot afford to regulate out of existence.
The withdrawal of Coinbase’s support made it clear that even industry leaders are unwilling to compromise on provisions they view as existential threats.
What the Delay Means for Innovation
For the crypto industry, the delay buys time. Companies and advocacy groups are expected to intensify lobbying efforts, pushing for revisions that address their concerns while still meeting lawmakers’ goals around oversight and consumer protection.
Experts say a revised bill could emerge that narrows controversial provisions, offers clearer definitions, and provides safe harbors for innovation. Such an outcome, they argue, could ultimately strengthen confidence in digital assets.
“In the long run, clear and fair rules are good for everyone,” said a policy analyst tracking the debate. “The challenge is getting the details right.”
The Broader Regulatory Context
The stalled bill also reflects a broader shift in how crypto regulation is unfolding in the U.S. Rather than sweeping legislation moving quickly through Congress, progress has been incremental, shaped by court rulings, agency actions, and targeted bills.
Some lawmakers have suggested breaking crypto regulation into smaller pieces, addressing stablecoins, market structure, and consumer protection separately. Others continue to push for comprehensive frameworks, arguing that piecemeal approaches create gaps and confusion.
The fate of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act may influence which strategy gains momentum.
What Comes Next
For now, the Senate Banking Committee has not announced a new date for the markup vote. Behind the scenes, discussions are expected to continue as lawmakers weigh possible revisions.
Coinbase and other industry players are likely to remain deeply involved in the process, advocating for changes they believe would allow U.S. crypto markets to compete globally while still protecting investors.
The delay also puts pressure on lawmakers to demonstrate progress. With digital assets continuing to grow in scale and influence, calls for regulatory clarity are unlikely to fade.
A Familiar Tension in Crypto Policy
The canceled vote underscores a recurring theme in crypto policy: the tension between regulation and innovation. Too little oversight can invite abuse. Too much, or poorly designed oversight, can drive innovation elsewhere.
As the pause unfolds, both lawmakers and industry leaders face the same challenge they have for years: finding common ground in a rapidly evolving sector where the stakes are increasingly high.
Conclusion
The U.S. Senate’s decision to cancel a vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act after Coinbase withdrew support marks another pivotal moment in the long-running debate over crypto regulation. While the delay is a setback for legislative momentum, it may also prevent the passage of rules that critics say could have harmed innovation.
For the crypto industry, the pause offers time to push for more balanced legislation. For lawmakers, it is a reminder that effective crypto policy requires careful drafting, broad consultation, and a willingness to revise.
As discussions continue, one thing remains clear: the path to clear, workable crypto regulation in the United States is proving to be as complex as the technology itself.
hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.
Writer @Ethan
Ethan Collins is a passionate crypto journalist and blockchain enthusiast, always on the hunt for the latest trends shaking up the digital finance world. With a knack for turning complex blockchain developments into engaging, easy-to-understand stories, he keeps readers ahead of the curve in the fast-paced crypto universe. Whether it’s Bitcoin, Ethereum, or emerging altcoins, Ethan dives deep into the markets to uncover insights, rumors, and opportunities that matter to crypto fans everywhere.
Disclaimer:
The articles on HOKANEWS are here to keep you updated on the latest buzz in crypto, tech, and beyond—but they’re not financial advice. We’re sharing info, trends, and insights, not telling you to buy, sell, or invest. Always do your own homework before making any money moves.
HOKANEWS isn’t responsible for any losses, gains, or chaos that might happen if you act on what you read here. Investment decisions should come from your own research—and, ideally, guidance from a qualified financial advisor. Remember: crypto and tech move fast, info changes in a blink, and while we aim for accuracy, we can’t promise it’s 100% complete or up-to-date.