U.S. Senate Set to Move on Crypto Market Structure Bill in Early January

Crypto Market Structure Bill Poised to Advance as Senate Prepares January Markups

Momentum is building in Washington around long-awaited cryptocurrency regulation, as U.S. lawmakers prepare to take the next concrete steps on market structure legislation. According to industry leaders closely tracking developments on Capitol Hill, early January 2026 could mark a pivotal moment for how digital assets are regulated in the United States.

Speaking publicly this week, The Digital Chamber CEO Cody Carbone said the second week of January is expected to include at least one Senate markup on pending crypto market structure legislation. The comment signals growing confidence that months of negotiations, hearings, and behind-the-scenes drafting are finally converging toward legislative action.

Source: Xpost

The update, first highlighted by the X account Coin Bureau and cited by the hokanews editorial team, has renewed attention on a bill that could reshape oversight of cryptocurrencies, exchanges, and digital asset intermediaries in the world’s largest financial market.

What a Senate “Markup” Means for Crypto

A markup is a formal stage in the legislative process where lawmakers review, amend, and vote on a bill’s language within committee before it can advance to the full chamber. While it does not guarantee final passage, a markup represents a significant step forward, signaling that legislation has enough consensus to move beyond discussion.

For the crypto industry, this moment has been years in the making. Since the early growth of digital assets, lawmakers have debated how to regulate the sector without stifling innovation. A market structure bill is designed to answer foundational questions, including which federal agencies oversee various crypto activities and how digital assets are classified under U.S. law.

Why Market Structure Has Become the Focus

Unlike enforcement actions or isolated policy proposals, market structure legislation aims to define the rules of the road for the entire crypto ecosystem. That includes exchanges, brokers, stablecoin issuers, decentralized protocols, and custodians.

At the heart of the debate is the division of authority between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Industry participants have long argued that the lack of clarity between these agencies has created regulatory uncertainty, discouraging investment and pushing innovation offshore.

A comprehensive bill would attempt to clarify which digital assets are treated as securities, which fall under commodities oversight, and how trading platforms should be registered and supervised.

Industry Reaction: Cautious Optimism

Carbone’s comments have been interpreted as a sign that lawmakers are ready to move from theory to action. Industry groups say the tone in Washington has shifted over the past year, with more bipartisan engagement and a growing recognition that the status quo is unsustainable.

Executives across the crypto sector have repeatedly called for clear, consistent rules rather than regulation through enforcement. A Senate markup would suggest that at least some of those concerns are being taken seriously.

Still, optimism is tempered by realism. Previous attempts at crypto legislation have stalled amid political disagreements, competing priorities, and election-year dynamics. Even supporters of the bill caution that amendments during markup could significantly alter its scope.

What the Bill Is Expected to Address

While final language has not yet been released, drafts and public discussions indicate that the market structure bill could focus on several core areas:

Asset classification: Clear definitions distinguishing digital securities from digital commodities
Exchange oversight: Registration and compliance requirements for crypto trading platforms
Consumer protection: Standards for custody, disclosures, and risk management
Jurisdictional clarity: Formal division of oversight between federal regulators

Supporters argue that these elements are essential for protecting investors while allowing responsible innovation to continue within the U.S.

Senate Timing and Political Context

The expected January markup comes at a strategically important time. With a new legislative session underway in 2026, lawmakers have an opportunity to reset priorities and address unresolved policy questions carried over from previous years.

Crypto regulation has increasingly become a bipartisan issue, driven in part by the sector’s growth and its expanding voter base. Lawmakers from both parties have acknowledged that digital assets are no longer a niche topic and that clearer rules are needed to prevent future market disruptions.

At the same time, broader economic concerns—ranging from inflation to financial stability—have kept digital assets on the radar of policymakers focused on systemic risk.

Why This Matters for Markets

While a markup itself does not change the law, markets tend to react to signs of regulatory clarity. Investors often view structured legislation as a positive development, reducing uncertainty that can weigh on asset prices and business decisions.

For crypto markets, progress on market structure legislation could influence sentiment around U.S.-based exchanges, blockchain startups, and institutional adoption. Clearer rules may also encourage more traditional financial firms to expand their involvement in digital assets.

However, analysts caution that the content of the bill will matter as much as its movement. Provisions seen as overly restrictive could have the opposite effect, prompting pushback from the industry and market participants.

A Long Road Still Ahead

Even if a Senate markup occurs in January, significant hurdles remain. The bill would still need to pass committee votes, advance to the full Senate, and potentially be reconciled with House legislation before reaching the president’s desk.

Past experience suggests that crypto legislation can evolve substantially during this process. Amendments, political negotiations, and external events could all influence the final outcome.

Still, for an industry that has often complained of being ignored or misunderstood, the prospect of structured debate and legislative progress represents a meaningful shift.

Confirmation From Industry Watchers

The update shared by Carbone and amplified by Coin Bureau underscores how closely industry observers are watching Capitol Hill. While official Senate schedules have yet to be finalized, multiple sources suggest that early January is shaping up to be an important window for crypto policy.

The hokanews team notes that such confirmations from established industry organizations often precede formal announcements, adding weight to expectations of near-term movement.

Conclusion

The prospect of a Senate markup on crypto market structure legislation in January 2026 marks a potentially important turning point for U.S. digital asset regulation. While challenges remain and outcomes are far from certain, the signal from industry leaders is clear: momentum is building.

For crypto investors, companies, and policymakers alike, the coming weeks could help determine whether the U.S. finally moves toward a clearer regulatory framework—or whether uncertainty continues to define the landscape. Either way, the discussion around market structure is no longer theoretical. It is entering a phase where decisions, amendments, and votes will begin to shape the future of crypto in America.

hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.