Upbit Hack Sparks Change: South Korea May Force Crypto Exchanges to Compensate Users Like Banks
South Korea Moves Toward Bank-Level Liability Rules for Crypto Exchanges After Upbit Breach
South Korea is preparing to introduce one of the strictest consumer-protection regulatory frameworks ever applied to digital asset platforms, as the government considers enforcing bank-grade no-fault liability requirements on cryptocurrency exchanges. This means exchanges could be compelled to compensate customers for losses arising from hacks, technical failures or system negligence, regardless of where the fault originates. The move follows a series of security breaches, with the most recent involving Upbit, one of the nation’s largest trading platforms.
The Financial Services Commission (FSC), acting alongside the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), is now reviewing amendments that would place crypto exchanges under the same legal compensation standards currently enforced on commercial banks and electronic settlement providers under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. If enacted, the new framework would significantly change the industry’s operational landscape, reshaping accountability in an ecosystem where user funds are often exposed to cyber-threats with minimal restitution.
South Korea’s proposal signals a firm shift away from the historically lenient posture toward digital asset operators, marking a turning point that aligns crypto oversight more closely with traditional finance. The decision gained urgency after the Upbit platform experienced a security breach on November 27, resulting in the unauthorized transfer of over 104 billion Solana-based tokens, valued at roughly 44.5 billion won. The assets moved to multiple external wallet addresses in less than an hour, raising concerns about system monitoring, internal triggers and automated threat response protocols.
A Breach That Sparked a National Regulatory Debate
The Upbit incident became the catalyst for renewed scrutiny of exchange security architecture. Analysts note that the breach was not only financial but reputational, underscoring the vulnerability of centralized platforms managing massive volumes of digital assets. Unlike victims of bank fraud, Korean crypto investors currently have limited avenues for compensation following hacks, unless negligence is proven — an often lengthy and complex legal process.
 |
| Source: koreatimes |
The Korea Times first reported that regulators are motivated to reduce this gap by shifting liability away from users and onto the institutions managing their assets. Under the proposed no-fault model, exchanges would be responsible for reimbursing customers even in cases where attacks originate externally. Such legislation mirrors reimbursement mechanisms applied in traditional banking disputes, where depositors are legally protected under consumer assurance frameworks.
According to government data submitted to the National Assembly, the five leading Korean crypto exchanges have recorded at least twenty service interruptions since early 2023. Collectively, these failures affected more than nine hundred users and resulted in estimated losses exceeding five billion won. Upbit alone was responsible for six outages during this period, impacting more than six hundred traders. The figures highlight persistent infrastructure weaknesses across the sector, raising questions regarding platform reliability, contingency protocols and disaster-response strategies.
Officials argue that as the crypto ecosystem grows — both in retail adoption and institutional integration — consumer protection mechanisms must evolve proportionally. South Korea, where digital asset trading remains one of the highest per capita globally, cannot rely on outdated frameworks. A system where users shoulder the full burden of exchange risk is increasingly viewed as unsustainable, especially as digital asset markets become intertwined with traditional financial activity.
Tougher Standards, Higher Fines, Full Industry Overhaul
The proposed amendment could also introduce penalties of unprecedented magnitude. Lawmakers are evaluating changes that would allow regulators to impose fines amounting to as much as three percent of an exchange’s annual revenue in cases of hacks or data exposure. This standard mirrors penalties imposed on regulated banking institutions. Under current crypto-related statutes, the maximum penalty for major exchange failures is roughly 3.4 million dollars — a figure critics argue is too small to incentivize industry-wide modernization.
If approved, the bill would push platforms to invest heavily in security infrastructure. Exchanges may be required to upgrade cold wallet reserves, integrate zero-trust authentication frameworks, and adopt real-time fraud detection systems. Insiders expect a rise in security specialists, independent audits, round-the-clock monitoring teams and mandatory insurance reserves.
Policymakers stress the urgency behind these reforms. Many believe the growth of South Korea’s digital asset sector has outpaced its regulatory structure, leaving systemic vulnerabilities exposed. Crypto trading volume in South Korea ranks among the highest globally, often exceeding domestic stock market activity during bull cycles. Yet, many protections present in traditional finance remain absent in the crypto sector.
Lawmakers indicate the bill aligns with a broader agenda to transition crypto oversight from loosely structured monitoring into institutional supervision. Regulators want digital asset platforms to operate under standards comparable to major financial institutions, not tech startups.
The reforms extend beyond compensation rules. Government officials are working concurrently on a draft stablecoin bill, expected to define issuance safeguards, reserve requirements, audit mandates and redemption rights. The National Assembly requested that the final draft be submitted by December 10. Should regulators miss the deadline, legislative leaders indicated they intend to proceed independently, a strong indicator of political determination to accelerate crypto policy.
South Korea hopes to present the stablecoin bill for debate in January 2026 during the extraordinary parliamentary session. This is expected to complement the no-fault compensation proposal, forming a dual-structure regulatory package that could redefine crypto legality in the region.
Industry Reactions Split as Exchanges Brace for Change
Market response has been mixed. Investor advocacy groups strongly support the proposed reforms, noting that retail users have historically absorbed the full risk of platform failures. They argue that exchanges profit from trading revenue and listing fees, and therefore must shoulder proportional responsibility for asset security.
Exchanges, however, caution that the financial burden could be immense when facing sophisticated cyberattacks. Industry representatives warn that blanket compensation requirements could pressure smaller exchanges out of the market, consolidating power among dominant players. Some fear that excessive regulation could push innovation offshore to more flexible jurisdictions.
Despite critique, analysts predict that regulation could boost investor confidence long-term, increasing institutional participation and enabling listing of tokenized financial products. South Korea has ambitions to become a regional digital asset hub, and robust security standards could enhance its credibility.
Cybersecurity experts argue that the future of exchange safety lies in layered defense models integrating cold storage, distributed key management and AI-based intrusion mitigation. With liability pressure shifting inward, exchanges are expected to accelerate upgrades that have been delayed due to cost.
A New Era of Accountability in Digital Finance
The Upbit breach cast a spotlight not only on system shortcomings but also on procedural transparency. Reports indicate that although suspicious activity was detected around 5 a.m., regulatory authorities were notified almost six hours later. Members of parliament have questioned the timing, noting the notification occurred shortly after Upbit’s operator Dunamu completed a merger deal with Naver Financial. The delay provoked debate concerning reporting obligations, internal disclosure rules and crisis communication ethics.
Government officials state that the forthcoming law will likely include mandatory disclosure deadlines for security incidents, with potential penalties for delayed reporting. Transparency has become a key legislative priority in preventing asset drain during ongoing breaches.
The movement toward regulatory modernization aligns South Korea with global trends. The European Union has advanced MiCA rule implementation, the United States is expanding enforcement actions, and Singapore continues tightening licensing standards. South Korea’s approach, however, may become one of the most investor-friendly regulatory models if compensation requirements are formally enacted.
The next several months will be decisive. Should lawmakers finalize both the no-fault liability provisions and the stablecoin framework, South Korea could enter 2026 as one of the most tightly regulated and safest digital asset environments globally. For investors, this may signal an era where crypto trading carries institutional assurance previously limited to banking.
For exchanges, it represents a future where operational security is not merely recommended, but legally required.
hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.