OM Token Crash Explained: OKX Says Colluding Accounts, Not MANTRA, Triggered the Dump
OM Token Price Crash Explained: OKX Points to Colluding Accounts, Not MANTRA
The sudden collapse of MANTRA’s OM token earlier this year continues to send shockwaves through the crypto industry, as new details emerge surrounding what triggered one of the most controversial price crashes of 2025. Cryptocurrency exchange OKX has now publicly addressed the incident, firmly rejecting claims that it was responsible for the sharp decline and instead blaming a coordinated market manipulation effort involving multiple colluding accounts.
The explanation, released amid mounting legal scrutiny and a renewed dispute between OKX and the MANTRA team, sheds light on how leveraged positions, token concentration, and opaque trading activity combined to produce a rapid market breakdown. With regulators now reviewing evidence and lawsuits underway, the OM crash has become a case study in the risks that continue to challenge the digital asset ecosystem.
What Happened to the OM Token?
According to OKX, the dramatic price drop in MANTRA’s OM token was not the result of exchange-driven liquidation or technical failure, but rather a premeditated manipulation strategy executed by a group of related accounts.
The exchange stated that these accounts held an unusually large share of OM’s circulating supply. Using those holdings as collateral, the accounts borrowed significant amounts of USDT, artificially driving up OM’s price before triggering a rapid collapse. The sudden reversal led to cascading losses across the market.
OKX said its internal risk monitoring systems detected abnormal activity at an early stage. Exchange officials contacted the account holders involved and requested corrective measures to reduce systemic risk. When cooperation was allegedly refused, OKX took control of the accounts to prevent further market disruption.
While only a small portion of OM tokens was liquidated during the intervention, the abrupt price drop resulted in substantial losses for traders.
OKX Covers Losses With $724 Million Security Fund
One of the most striking elements of OKX’s response is its claim that all losses linked to the OM crash were fully covered by the platform’s Security Fund. As of the third quarter of 2025, the fund was valued at approximately $724 million.
 |
| Source: Official X |
According to OKX, the Security Fund functioned exactly as intended, absorbing losses to protect users from systemic harm. The exchange emphasized that it did not profit from the event and that the intervention was aimed solely at containing risk rather than aggressively liquidating positions.
OKX also stated that third-party audits and independent analyses suggest that nearly 70% of OM’s price collapse originated from off-exchange perpetual futures trading rather than spot transactions conducted on OKX itself. This finding, the exchange argues, further distances it from responsibility for the crash.
Accusations of Token Concentration and Manipulation
In its public statement, OKX raised serious concerns about OM token distribution. The exchange noted that the accounts involved in the manipulation held a disproportionately large amount of OM, raising questions about how the token was initially allocated and whether supply concentration played a role in enabling the crash.
Token concentration has long been a red flag in crypto markets, as it allows a small number of holders to exert outsized influence over price movements. OKX suggested that the OM incident highlights the dangers of insufficient transparency around token origins and early distribution.
The exchange maintained that its actions were reactive, not causal. It argued that without intervention, the losses could have been far more severe.
Regulatory Scrutiny Intensifies
Following the incident, OKX said it submitted full documentation and trading records to regulators and law enforcement agencies. Investigations are currently ongoing, though specific jurisdictions and authorities have not been publicly disclosed.
Multiple lawsuits related to the OM crash have reportedly been filed, signaling growing legal pressure not only on exchanges but also on token issuers and project teams. Regulators are increasingly focused on leverage abuse, market manipulation, and disclosure practices within centralized platforms.
The OM case comes at a time when global regulators are tightening oversight of crypto markets, demanding higher standards of transparency and accountability from both exchanges and blockchain projects.
Conflict Between OKX and the MANTRA Team
The situation has been further complicated by a public dispute between OKX and the MANTRA team. According to OKX, MANTRA representatives failed to provide clear answers regarding the origin of large OM holdings and instead accused the exchange of wrongdoing.
OKX described the team’s conduct as unprofessional, stating that public accusations without addressing core transparency issues only deepened confusion among investors. The exchange reiterated that its primary focus remains user protection and regulatory compliance.
MANTRA, for its part, has pushed back against OKX’s narrative. In early December, MANTRA’s CEO urged users to withdraw OM tokens from OKX, citing alleged inconsistencies and false timelines related to an upcoming token migration.
Token Migration Adds Fuel to the Fire
The renewed controversy comes as MANTRA prepares to execute a 1:1000 token migration later this month. Token migrations are complex events that often heighten market sensitivity, particularly when trust between exchanges and project teams is strained.
OKX responded to MANTRA’s withdrawal call by reaffirming its position and pointing to unresolved questions surrounding the manipulation incident. The exchange warned that ongoing investigations must be resolved before confidence can be fully restored.
Within the crypto community, the migration has become a focal point for broader debates about accountability, governance, and exchange responsibility.
Market Reaction Remains Deeply Divided
Investor reaction to the OM crash and subsequent statements has been sharply polarized. Critics of OKX accuse the exchange of lacking transparency and question how such concentrated positions were allowed to build in the first place.
Others defend OKX, pointing to its risk management systems, the existence of a sizable Security Fund, and its cooperation with regulators as evidence that the platform acted responsibly under extreme circumstances.
Social media discussions and community forums remain emotionally charged, reflecting the broader tension that often follows high-profile market failures.
Broader Lessons for the Crypto Industry
The OM token crash underscores persistent structural risks within the crypto market. Token concentration, excessive leverage, and opaque trading activity continue to create conditions where rapid collapses are possible.
For centralized exchanges, the incident highlights the importance of early detection systems, robust insurance mechanisms, and transparent communication. For project teams, it reinforces the need for clear disclosure around token supply, distribution, and governance.
As regulators intensify scrutiny, incidents like OM are likely to shape future policy decisions and compliance requirements across the industry.
What Comes Next?
With investigations ongoing and legal proceedings unfolding, the full consequences of the OM crash have yet to be determined. Much will depend on regulatory findings and whether further evidence emerges regarding market manipulation or disclosure failures.
In the meantime, the crypto market remains on edge. The OM incident serves as a reminder that despite growing institutional interest and regulatory engagement, digital assets remain vulnerable to sudden shocks.
For investors, the lesson is clear: transparency, risk management, and diversification remain critical in an environment where trust can evaporate quickly.
Final Thoughts
The collapse of MANTRA’s OM token has evolved into more than a single market event. It has become a flashpoint for broader debates about exchange responsibility, project transparency, and regulatory oversight.
As OKX and MANTRA continue to clash over narratives, one thing is certain: the outcome of this case will have lasting implications for how crypto markets operate and how participants are held accountable in the years ahead.
hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.