FTX Bankruptcy Explodes: $130B Lost, $2.5B Fees—SBF vs CEO Ray Showdown
FTX Bankruptcy Under Scrutiny: SBF Claims $130 Billion in Mismanaged Assets
The fallout from FTX’s 2022 collapse continues to reverberate through the cryptocurrency world. Recent revelations from Sam Bankman-Fried, the exchange’s founder, have reignited debates over the handling of FTX’s bankruptcy and the accuracy of claims surrounding its solvency. Central to the discussion is SBF’s contention that the exchange was, in fact, not insolvent at the time of filing, and that mismanagement under the current CEO, John J. Ray III, may have resulted in significant asset losses.
FTX Collapse: The Official Narrative vs. Emerging Claims
When FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022, the narrative was clear: the exchange faced an unprecedented liquidity crisis, leaving billions of dollars owed to customers and investors. John J. Ray III, appointed CEO to oversee the bankruptcy proceedings, repeatedly described the company as “deeply insolvent” and mismanaged, painting a picture of catastrophic failure.
 |
| Source: Official SBF X |
However, new information has prompted some analysts and creditors to question this narrative. A Google Drive document revealed during SBF’s appeal reportedly indicates that, on the date of bankruptcy filing, FTX held approximately $15 billion in assets against $8 billion in liabilities. This suggests that, technically, assets exceeded debts, challenging the prevailing notion of insolvency.
Critics argue that valuable holdings, including Robinhood shares, Solana (SOL), and SUI tokens, may have been sold at significant discounts, potentially destroying up to $130 billion in value. These revelations have cast doubt on Ray’s management of the estate and the decisions made during the liquidation process.
Creditor Concerns and Public Backlash
The bankruptcy process has drawn significant scrutiny from creditors and the broader cryptocurrency community. Many investors are frustrated over perceived losses from discounted asset sales, legal fees, and consulting costs. In one widely circulated satirical video on X, a creditor named Arush lampooned Ray’s management practices, highlighting over $2.5 billion in professional fees and controversial asset sales, including the disposal of Anthropic shares valued at $16 billion for just $1.8 billion.
While the video employs humor, it underscores the serious anger and skepticism among creditors who feel that assets were mismanaged, diminishing their potential recovery. The recovery projections in official filings, which suggest 119%–143% repayment for creditors, offer some hope, but questions remain about whether the process maximized asset value.
SBF’s Perspective: FTX “Was Never Insolvent”
Sam Bankman-Fried has emphasized that his intention is not to absolve himself of responsibility but to highlight what he sees as mismanagement under Ray’s administration. SBF contends that funds owed to creditors, particularly international investors, remain unpaid, citing ongoing cases like that of a Chinese investor referred to as “Mr. Ji.”
In public statements, SBF has maintained that the bankruptcy could have been handled more transparently and that asset sales and fee structures were poorly executed. He argues that the exchange’s solvency at the time of filing raises questions about why bankruptcy was necessary and who ultimately benefited from the liquidation.
CEO John Ray’s Response
John J. Ray III has defended his decisions, asserting that they were necessary to stabilize FTX and preserve as much value as possible for creditors. Ray has characterized the fees and bonuses associated with the bankruptcy as appropriate for the extraordinary effort required to manage the estate. Under his leadership, FTX has undergone a complex reorganization process involving hundreds of court filings, asset recoveries, and settlements.
Ray’s critics, however, claim that his administration may have overstepped by including solvent exchanges in the bankruptcy, particularly in the EU and Japan, and using estate funds for litigation against former employees. The tension between creditor expectations and management decisions has fueled ongoing debates about accountability and fairness in one of the largest cryptocurrency bankruptcies in history.
Current State of FTX Recovery
As of November 2025, FTX’s recovery process remains underway. Creditors are seeking full repayment, yet controversy persists regarding the total value lost through discounted asset sales and high legal fees. Estimates suggest that bankruptcy costs could exceed $2.5 billion, making it the most expensive bankruptcy case since Lehman Brothers. The outcome of these proceedings could significantly influence public perception of the collapse and set precedents for future cryptocurrency bankruptcy cases.
The process has also highlighted the broader risks within the crypto industry, particularly regarding transparency, asset management, and regulatory oversight. FTX’s case serves as a stark reminder of the need for rigorous governance and oversight in a market known for its rapid innovation and volatility.
Implications for the Cryptocurrency Ecosystem
FTX’s bankruptcy and the ongoing appeals carry implications beyond the exchange itself. The case has drawn the attention of institutional investors, regulators, and cryptocurrency enthusiasts worldwide, prompting discussions on risk management, corporate governance, and investor protection.
The potential revelation that FTX may have been solvent at the time of filing has sparked renewed scrutiny over the role of management and advisors in the bankruptcy process. Analysts warn that if asset mismanagement is confirmed, it could erode trust in centralized exchanges and influence the behavior of investors and regulators moving forward.
Furthermore, the situation raises questions about how future collapses in the crypto space will be handled and whether current bankruptcy frameworks are adequate for digital assets. The intersection of blockchain technology, complex token holdings, and global financial systems presents unique challenges that traditional bankruptcy laws may not fully address.
Looking Ahead: What to Expect
The appeal and ongoing discussions are expected to continue shaping the narrative around FTX for months to come. As legal proceedings progress, the cryptocurrency community will be watching closely to see how asset recoveries are managed and whether creditors receive the full value of their claims.
This unfolding saga also underscores the importance of due diligence, transparency, and accountability in cryptocurrency investments. For both retail and institutional participants, the lessons from FTX’s bankruptcy are likely to influence strategies, regulatory approaches, and risk management practices across the sector.
Conclusion
FTX’s bankruptcy remains one of the most high-profile and controversial cases in cryptocurrency history. With SBF challenging the narrative of insolvency and raising concerns about potential asset mismanagement, the situation highlights deep tensions between management decisions, creditor expectations, and market transparency.
Whether FTX was truly bankrupt at the time of filing or whether mismanagement led to massive asset loss, the case provides critical insights into the challenges of governing digital asset exchanges and protecting investors in a rapidly evolving financial landscape. As the appeals process unfolds, the crypto industry and its stakeholders are left to navigate the complex aftermath of one of its most significant collapses.
hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.
