-->
uMaHF0G5M1jYL9t88qHEEkQggU6GJ5wTZlhvItt7
Bookmark

$129M DeFi Meltdown: Oracle Glitches and Security Flaws Rock Multi-Chain Platforms

Two major DeFi protocols, Balancer and Moonwell, lost $129 million within 48 hours due to oracle failures and access control vulnerabilities. Experts

 

hokanews,hoka news,hokanews.com,pi coin,coin,crypto,cryptocurrency,blockchain,pi network,pi network open mainnet,news,pi news  Coin Cryptocurrency  Digital currency     Pi Network     Decentralized finance     Blockchain     Mining     Wallet     Altcoins     Smart contracts     Tokenomics     Initial Coin Offering (ICO)     Proof of Stake (PoS) Airdrop   Proof of Work (PoW)     Public key cryptography Bsc News bitcoin btc Ethereum, web3hokanewshokanews,hoka news,hokanews.com,pi coin,coin,crypto,cryptocurrency,blockchain,pi network,pi network open mainnet,news,pi news  Coin Cryptocurrency  Digital currency     Pi Network     Decentralized finance     Blockchain     Mining     Wallet     Altcoins     Smart contracts     Tokenomics     Initial Coin Offering (ICO)     Proof of Stake (PoS) Airdrop   Proof of Work (PoW)     Public key cryptography Bsc News bitcoin btc Ethereum, web3hokanewshokanews,hoka news,hokanews.com,pi coin,coin,crypto,cryptocurrency,blockchain,pi network,pi network open mainnet,news,pi news  Coin Cryptocurrency  Digital currency     Pi Network     Decentralized finance     Blockchain     Mining     Wallet     Altcoins     Smart contracts     Tokenomics     Initial Coin Offering (ICO)     Proof of Stake (PoS) Airdrop   Proof of Work (PoW)     Public key cryptography Bsc News bitcoin btc Ethereum, web3hokanews

The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector experienced a tumultuous start to November 2025, as two major protocols suffered a combined loss of $129 million in just 48 hours, highlighting persistent vulnerabilities in multi-chain systems. The incidents at Balancer and Moonwell underscore the inherent risks of relying on third-party infrastructure, including oracle networks and insufficient access control mechanisms.

On November 3, Balancer faced a catastrophic exploit resulting in a $128 million loss. This was followed by Moonwell’s $1 million breach on November 4, triggered by a malfunctioning Chainlink oracle. Together, these events have reignited concerns about the systemic risks in the DeFi ecosystem, where even established projects remain susceptible to sophisticated attacks exploiting weak infrastructure and governance flaws.


hokanews,hoka news,hokanews.com,pi coin,coin,crypto,cryptocurrency,blockchain,pi network,pi network open mainnet,news,pi news  Coin Cryptocurrency  Digital currency     Pi Network     Decentralized finance     Blockchain     Mining     Wallet     Altcoins     Smart contracts     Tokenomics     Initial Coin Offering (ICO)     Proof of Stake (PoS) Airdrop   Proof of Work (PoW)     Public key cryptography Bsc News bitcoin btc Ethereum, web3hokanewshokanews,hoka news,hokanews.com,pi coin,coin,crypto,cryptocurrency,blockchain,pi network,pi network open mainnet,news,pi news  Coin Cryptocurrency  Digital currency     Pi Network     Decentralized finance     Blockchain     Mining     Wallet     Altcoins     Smart contracts     Tokenomics     Initial Coin Offering (ICO)     Proof of Stake (PoS) Airdrop   Proof of Work (PoW)     Public key cryptography Bsc News bitcoin btc Ethereum, web3hokanewshokanews,hoka news,hokanews.com,pi coin,coin,crypto,cryptocurrency,blockchain,pi network,pi network open mainnet,news,pi news  Coin Cryptocurrency  Digital currency     Pi Network     Decentralized finance     Blockchain     Mining     Wallet     Altcoins     Smart contracts     Tokenomics     Initial Coin Offering (ICO)     Proof of Stake (PoS) Airdrop   Proof of Work (PoW)     Public key cryptography Bsc News bitcoin btc Ethereum, web3hokanews
Source: X

Moonwell Exploit Caused by Oracle Mispricing

Moonwell, a lending platform operating on the Base blockchain, fell victim to a Chainlink oracle error that temporarily mispriced a wrapped staked token, wrstETH. The attacker exploited this pricing anomaly by depositing just 0.02 wrstETH as collateral, which the oracle inaccurately valued at $5.8 million. Leveraging this inflated valuation, the attacker borrowed over 20 wstETH repeatedly within hours, netting a profit of approximately 295 ETH, valued at $1.1 million.

Blockchain analytics firm CertiK confirmed that the combination of infrastructure reliance and rapid execution enabled the hacker to avoid detection and liquidation. Following the exploit, Moonwell’s Total Value Locked (TVL) fell by $55 million to $213 million, and its native WELL token experienced a decline of over 12 percent. This marks the fourth significant breach Moonwell has suffered in three years, highlighting ongoing concerns about the platform’s risk management and security protocols.

Security analysts note that the vulnerability was not a simple smart contract bug but a broader systemic weakness tied to the protocol’s dependence on accurate oracle feeds. Oracle malfunctions, even brief ones, can create substantial discrepancies that malicious actors can exploit, emphasizing the importance of robust, decentralized price feeds for DeFi platforms.

Balancer’s Multi-Chain Breach Amplifies Security Concerns

The day before Moonwell’s incident, Balancer suffered a multi-chain attack that exploited access control flaws, resulting in a staggering $128 million loss. This breach spanned Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, and Sonic networks, forcing Berachain to implement an emergency hard fork to contain the damage.

Analysts identified the root cause of the exploit as weak permissioning across the protocol. The lack of stringent access controls allowed attackers to manipulate assets across chains, demonstrating that DeFi vulnerabilities extend beyond individual smart contracts to the operational architecture of the entire system. Unlike Moonwell, which relied on mispriced oracle data, Balancer’s failure stemmed from governance and access weaknesses that could have been mitigated with rigorous internal security audits and testing.

Systemic Vulnerabilities in DeFi Highlighted by Repeated Incidents

The recent $129 million combined loss underscores recurring security challenges in the DeFi sector. Earlier in 2025, Moonwell faced criticism after canceling its Immunefi bug bounty program, reducing the incentive for ethical hackers to report vulnerabilities. Such decisions can perpetuate security gaps, leaving platforms increasingly exposed to exploitation. Altcoin platforms have suffered multiple losses totaling $2.7 million within a month, further illustrating the fragility of current security practices.

Experts argue that these high-profile incidents reveal broader systemic weaknesses in multi-chain protocols. They stress that while smart contract code may be rigorously tested, vulnerabilities often emerge at the infrastructure level. Reliance on centralized or semi-centralized oracle services, poor access control, and insufficient monitoring can combine to create catastrophic outcomes for both users and investors.

Industry Response and Mitigation Strategies

In the wake of these attacks, DeFi developers and security firms are advocating for several key mitigation strategies:

  1. Decentralized and Redundant Oracles: Using multiple oracle sources can reduce the risk of single-point failures and mispricing incidents. Protocols are increasingly considering multi-oracle architectures to ensure price data integrity.

  2. Enhanced Access Controls: Strict governance protocols and multi-signature mechanisms are essential to prevent unauthorized asset manipulation. Regular audits and real-time monitoring can detect anomalies before exploitation occurs.

  3. Bug Bounty Programs: Maintaining active bug bounty initiatives encourages ethical hackers to identify and report vulnerabilities proactively. Moonwell’s decision to cancel its bounty program may have contributed to the repeated breaches it has experienced.

  4. Stress Testing and Simulation: Protocols are urged to conduct regular simulations of edge cases, including oracle failures and multi-chain interactions, to ensure system resilience against extreme events.

  5. Insurance and Risk Mitigation: Some DeFi platforms are exploring insurance mechanisms to protect users from potential losses, providing a safety net against catastrophic exploits.

Conclusion

The $129 million loss across Balancer and Moonwell in just two days serves as a stark reminder that even the most sophisticated DeFi protocols remain vulnerable. Oracle malfunctions, access control weaknesses, and reliance on external infrastructure continue to threaten the stability of decentralized finance. While smart contracts receive considerable scrutiny, systemic risks at the protocol level demand equal attention.

As DeFi adoption grows, the industry faces a pivotal challenge: balancing innovation with robust security. Investors, developers, and regulators alike must consider how to build resilient protocols capable of withstanding complex exploits. These incidents highlight the urgent need for standardized security practices, redundant infrastructure, and ongoing vigilance to ensure the future stability of decentralized finance.

The lessons from November 2025’s DeFi breaches will likely shape protocol design, security audits, and risk management strategies for years to come. Platforms that fail to address these systemic issues may face repeated attacks, potentially undermining confidence in the broader DeFi ecosystem.


hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.

Writer @Erlin
Erlin is an experienced crypto writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides insights into the latest trends and innovations in the digital currency space.
 
 Check out other news and articles on Google News


Disclaimer:


The articles published on hokanews are intended to provide up-to-date information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended as an invitation to buy, sell, or invest in any assets. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making any investment or financial decisions.
hokanews is not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from the use of information provided on this site. Investment decisions should be based on thorough research and advice from qualified financial advisors. Information on HokaNews may change without notice, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the content published.

Listen
Pilih Suara
1x
* Mengubah pengaturan akan membuat artikel dibacakan ulang dari awal.