$4 Memecoin Explodes to $200M Market Cap – CZ’s Endorsement Sparks Controversy

$4 Memecoin’s Meteoric Rise: From Hack Scandal to Community Takeover and Market Frenzy

The cryptocurrency world has never been short of drama, but the latest story surrounding the $4 memecoin may be one of the most unexpected rollercoasters of 2025. What began as a bizarre byproduct of a blockchain hack has now morphed into a $200 million market cap sensation, drawing headlines, stirring heated debates, and once again highlighting the volatile intersection between community-driven hype and institutional influence.

At the heart of the controversy is Binance founder Changpeng Zhao—better known as CZ—whose subtle nod of support has transformed this token from a niche curiosity into a global talking point. But while the meteoric rise of the $4 memecoin has ignited excitement among traders, it has also sparked anxiety and speculation, with many questioning the sustainability of its growth and the true motivations behind its sudden ascent.

A Coin Born From a Hack

The origin story of the $4 memecoin is as unconventional as it gets. Unlike most meme-inspired tokens that emerge from internet humor or grassroots communities, this one was created under much darker circumstances. It was initially launched by a hacker who exploited a vulnerability on the BNB Chain, siphoning funds and leaving the ecosystem shaken.

Instead of fading into obscurity or being abandoned after the incident, the token was soon taken over by the community. This unusual twist—where an exploit-linked asset was “rescued” by everyday traders and developers—gave the project an aura of rebellion and resilience. By reclaiming control, the community not only distanced the token from its criminal origins but also positioned it as a symbol of decentralization and collective ownership.

What no one anticipated, however, was that this quirky asset would soon catch the eye of one of the most powerful figures in the crypto industry.

CZ’s Endorsement: Catalyst for a Market Frenzy

Changpeng Zhao’s involvement in the story added fuel to the already blazing fire. Known for his loyal following and outsized influence in the digital asset space, Zhao has frequently used the number “4” as a symbolic shorthand for ignoring fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD).

When Zhao appeared to endorse the $4 memecoin on social media—coupled with cryptic posts from Binance’s official channels, including a message reading simply “1111”—the crypto community interpreted it as a signal of strong support. While Binance never explicitly confirmed backing the token, the implications were enough to send trading activity into overdrive.

The numbers tell the story. The price of the $4 memecoin surged to $0.1809 at its peak, pushing the market capitalization past $200 million. According to blockchain analytics firm Wu Blockchain, daily trading volume skyrocketed by an eye-watering 348,866%, reaching $200 million within just 24 hours.

Even more astonishing was the profit made by early adopters. One address, identified as holding 6.31% of the total supply, reportedly invested just $68,700 at an early price of $0.00109 per token. The unrealized gains ballooned to over $11 million—representing an extraordinary 16,100% return.

Community Takeover or Market Manipulation?

While many traders celebrated overnight wealth, skeptics quickly raised red flags. Critics argued that the $4 memecoin’s roots in a hack and its association with Zhao’s personal branding blurred the line between genuine community adoption and orchestrated hype.

Some questioned whether Zhao’s apparent endorsement was responsible, particularly given Binance’s ongoing regulatory scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions. Others speculated about possible hidden connections between the hacker, the takeover, and the subsequent push to mainstream recognition.

Crypto analyst Eleanor Terrett noted that while meme coins often thrive on speculation, “the $4 memecoin represents an entirely different challenge—one where a symbol of past exploitation is rebranded as a community project with celebrity backing. The question is whether investors are betting on fundamentals or simply following signals from powerful figures.”

The Highs and Lows of Market Reaction

Unsurprisingly, the rapid surge was followed by a sharp correction. Within days of reaching its peak, the $4 memecoin dropped to $0.1363, trimming its market cap to $136 million. While still an impressive valuation given its origins, the volatility left many investors rattled.

For some, this was just another example of the boom-and-bust cycle that characterizes meme coins. For others, it was a stark reminder of the dangers of speculative trading fueled by social media buzz and influencer endorsements.

“Memecoins live and die by their narratives,” explained Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart. “What we’re seeing with $4 is a perfect case study of how community storytelling, combined with the influence of a high-profile figure, can create massive market swings in a short span of time.”

Beyond the Meme: Implications for the Crypto Market

While the fate of the $4 memecoin remains uncertain, its rapid rise and controversy have broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry. First, it underscores the increasing power of communities in shaping token trajectories, even when the project begins under unusual or questionable circumstances.

Second, it highlights the ongoing debate around the influence of industry leaders like CZ. When a single figure can send billions of dollars in capital flowing toward or away from a project with a tweet or cryptic message, questions of accountability and market manipulation naturally arise.

Finally, it reveals how far meme coins have come in cementing themselves as a permanent fixture in the crypto ecosystem. Once dismissed as jokes or fleeting internet experiments, meme coins are now commanding serious market attention and billions in trading volume.

What Comes Next for the $4 Memecoin?

The road ahead for the $4 memecoin is anything but certain. If history is any guide, volatility will remain its defining feature. Its community-driven nature could sustain momentum, but without clear utility or long-term development, skepticism will persist.

Moreover, the regulatory environment poses challenges. With U.S. and international watchdogs increasingly focused on investor protection and market integrity, tokens that blur the line between parody and serious asset may face scrutiny. The fact that the $4 memecoin originated from a hack only adds to the complexity.

Still, for its supporters, the coin represents more than just a speculative gamble. To them, it is proof of the resilience of decentralized communities and their ability to reclaim and repurpose even the most unlikely projects.

Conclusion

The saga of the $4 memecoin is a reminder of why the crypto market continues to fascinate—and alarm—in equal measure. In less than a month, it has transformed from a hacker’s tool into a multi-million-dollar asset, drawing endorsements, sparking controversy, and leaving investors both jubilant and nervous.

Whether it eventually fades into obscurity or cements itself as a lasting fixture in the meme coin hall of fame, one thing is clear: the story of $4 has become a symbol of the chaotic, unpredictable, and undeniably captivating world of digital assets.

For traders, regulators, and industry leaders alike, the rise of the $4 memecoin is not just entertainment—it is a case study in the power of narrative, the risks of speculative mania, and the profound influence that a single endorsement can have in shaping markets.

Writer @Erlin

Erlin is an experienced crypto writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides insights into the latest trends and innovations in the digital currency space.

 

 Check out other news and articles on Google News

Disclaimer:

The articles published on hokanews are intended to provide up-to-date information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended as an invitation to buy, sell, or invest in any assets. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making any investment or financial decisions.

hokanews is not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from the use of information provided on this site. Investment decisions should be based on thorough research and advice from qualified financial advisors. Information on HokaNews may change without notice, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the content published.