Trump's Latest Broadside: "Too Late" for the Fed

Trump vs Powell: Inside the Growing Rift Over Federal Reserve Rate Policy

A clash at the highest levels of U.S. economic leadership is intensifying. Former President Donald Trump has once again taken aim at Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, accusing him of causing significant economic damage by delaying interest rate cuts. Trump’s sharp rebuke comes at a time when the Federal Reserve, under Powell’s stewardship, has chosen to hold its benchmark interest rate steady, prioritizing a data-driven approach amid inflation concerns and global uncertainty.

The latest salvo in this long-standing feud highlights not only the stark difference in economic philosophy between the two men but also the growing political tension surrounding the Fed’s independence as the 2026 presidential election draws closer.

Source: X

Trump’s Sharp Criticism: “Too Little, Too Late”

In a late-night post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump unleashed his frustrations, calling Powell “a real dummy” and accusing him of costing the United States “hundreds of billions of dollars” by not acting sooner to lower rates. Trump argued that had the Federal Reserve reduced interest rates earlier, the country would have saved billions in interest payments on the short-term debt accrued under President Joe Biden’s administration.

According to Trump, the U.S. is now burdened by interest rates that are 2.5 percentage points higher than they should be—a misstep that he believes has stifled economic growth and hampered America’s ability to remain competitive globally. He also suggested that Powell’s hesitancy to cut rates puts the U.S. at a disadvantage compared to other major economies, where central banks have already moved to ease borrowing costs.

Powell Holds Firm: Data Over Politics

Despite Trump’s increasingly vocal attacks, Chairman Powell has remained steadfast in defending the Fed’s cautious approach. Speaking at a post-meeting press conference following the latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decision, Powell emphasized that monetary policy decisions are grounded in economic data—not political influence.

“For the time being, we are well-positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policies,” Powell said. He reiterated that the Fed’s dual mandate—to promote maximum employment and maintain price stability—remains at the core of its decision-making process.

Powell and his colleagues have expressed concern that premature rate cuts could risk reigniting inflation, which, although off its peak, remains above the central bank’s 2% target. The Fed Chair noted that while tariffs and geopolitical tensions can add to economic uncertainty, the focus remains on sustainable progress toward price stability before easing rates.

Why Trump Is Pushing for Immediate Rate Cuts

Trump’s case for immediate rate cuts is rooted in his belief that the U.S. economy, despite facing global challenges, is fundamentally strong and could benefit from cheaper borrowing costs. He describes lower rates as “rocket fuel” that would supercharge growth, investment, and job creation.

Source: X

Moreover, Trump points to central banks in Europe that have already begun easing monetary policy, suggesting that the U.S. is falling behind in providing relief to businesses and consumers. He downplays the inflationary risks of cutting rates, arguing instead that the Fed’s reluctance to act is harming the economy’s potential.

Wall Street’s Reaction: Navigating Uncertainty

Following the Fed’s decision to hold rates steady in the range of 4.25% to 4.50%, financial markets reacted cautiously. Major stock indexes saw slight fluctuations as investors digested the central bank’s outlook, while bond yields dipped modestly—a reflection of lingering uncertainty over when, or if, rate cuts will materialize.

Market analysts remain divided. Some argue that the Fed’s conservative stance is necessary to anchor long-term stability, while others warn that continued inaction could stall the economy and damage the Fed’s credibility. The tension between market expectations and Fed policy continues to create volatility as investors try to anticipate the central bank’s next moves.

A Political and Policy Showdown on the Horizon

The growing rift between Trump and Powell may foreshadow significant shifts in U.S. monetary policy should Trump secure another term in the White House. Trump has made it clear that, if given the opportunity, he would appoint a Fed Chair who aligns more closely with his pro-growth, pro-stimulus views—potentially signaling a dramatic pivot in how the central bank operates.

Powell’s term is set to expire in 2026, making the next presidential election critical for the future of Fed leadership. The ongoing debate is not just about rates—it’s about the very nature of central bank independence and its role in navigating the complex U.S. and global economy.

Who Could Replace Powell?

As speculation mounts about the Fed’s future leadership, several names have surfaced as potential successors to Powell. According to recent prediction markets data, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh currently leads the field with modest support at 1.1%. Other contenders include economist Judy Shelton, tax policy advocate Arthur Laffer, former White House economist Kevin Hassett, and economist Larry Kudlow—all figures known for their support of lower interest rates and more accommodative monetary policy.

Should Trump return to power, it is likely that any nominee he puts forward would share his view that the Fed should act more aggressively to stimulate growth and reduce the cost of debt.

The Bigger Picture: The Stakes for the U.S. Economy

At the heart of this debate is a fundamental question: What is the right balance between supporting economic growth and guarding against inflation? Trump argues that the time for caution has passed and that the U.S. is missing opportunities to strengthen its economy. Powell, meanwhile, remains focused on ensuring that any action the Fed takes is consistent with achieving long-term stability.

Source: Polymarket

The outcome of this clash will have lasting implications. If Powell’s approach proves effective, it could reinforce the value of data-driven monetary policy insulated from political pressure. If Trump’s warnings of missed opportunities gain validation, it could fuel calls for a rethinking of central bank independence in favor of a more assertive, pro-growth stance.

Conclusion: A Pivotal Moment for the Federal Reserve

As the debate between Trump and Powell intensifies, the eyes of the financial world are fixed on the Federal Reserve’s next moves. The decisions made in the coming months will not only shape the trajectory of interest rates but also influence the credibility of the U.S. central bank and its ability to navigate an increasingly complex global economy.

For now, Powell stays the course, but with political noise growing louder, the future of U.S. monetary policy hangs in the balance.

Writer @Erlin

Erlin is an experienced crypto writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides insights into the latest trends and innovations in the digital currency space.

 

 Check out other news and articles on Google News

Disclaimer:

The articles published on hokanews are intended to provide up-to-date information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended as an invitation to buy, sell, or invest in any assets. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making any investment or financial decisions.

hokanews is not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from the use of information provided on this site. Investment decisions should be based on thorough research and advice from qualified financial advisors. Information on HokaNews may change without notice, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the content published.