Senate Stablecoin Bill: What’s Next for the GENIUS Act?

Senate Stablecoin Bill Faces Setback: GENIUS Act Fails to Pass Key Vote

In a significant development for cryptocurrency regulation, the U.S. Senate failed to advance the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act on May 8, 2025. The bill, aimed at establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for stablecoins, did not secure the 60 votes required to proceed, garnering only 49 in favor and 48 against. This outcome marks a notable setback for bipartisan efforts to regulate digital assets pegged to the U.S. dollar.

Understanding the GENIUS Act

The GENIUS Act was designed to create a federal regulatory structure for payment stablecoins, digital assets intended to maintain a stable value relative to the U.S. dollar. Key provisions of the bill included:

• Requiring stablecoin issuers to maintain 1:1 reserves backed by U.S. dollars or other high-quality liquid assets.

• Mandating monthly certifications of reserve holdings and prohibiting the rehypothecation of these reserves.

• Allowing state-regulated issuers with assets under $10 billion to operate under state supervision, provided the state's regulatory regime aligns with federal standards.

• Designating stablecoin issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, thereby subjecting them to anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements.

• Empowering the Secretary of the Treasury to take emergency actions against foreign stablecoin issuers posing national security risks.

The bill had previously passed the Senate Banking Committee with an 18-6 vote, reflecting initial bipartisan support.

Factors Leading to the Bill's Failure

Several factors contributed to the GENIUS Act's failure to advance:

1. Political Concerns and Allegations of Conflict of Interest

   Democratic senators expressed apprehension over former President Donald Trump's alleged involvement in cryptocurrency ventures, including a stablecoin project linked to a $2 billion investment from a UAE-based firm. Senator Elizabeth Warren and others raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the need for stricter regulations to prevent political figures from benefiting financially from crypto-related legislation.

2. Insufficient Time for Review and Debate

   Some lawmakers, including Democrats and a few Republicans, argued that the bill was being rushed without adequate time for thorough review and discussion. Senator Mark Warner, who had initially supported the bill, withdrew his backing, citing the need for more comprehensive deliberation.

3. Concerns Over Regulatory Oversight

   Critics of the bill highlighted potential gaps in regulatory oversight, particularly regarding foreign stablecoin issuers and the enforcement of AML and KYC standards. There were calls for more robust measures to prevent illicit activities and ensure national security.

4. Partisan Divisions

   While the bill initially enjoyed bipartisan support, the final vote revealed deepening partisan divisions. Two Republican senators, Josh Hawley and Rand Paul, joined most Democrats in opposing the bill, reflecting broader disagreements over the approach to cryptocurrency regulation.

Implications and Next Steps

The failure to advance the GENIUS Act underscores the complexities of establishing a regulatory framework for emerging financial technologies. While the bill's proponents argue that regulation is essential to protect consumers and ensure financial stability, opponents caution against hastily implemented measures that could stifle innovation or fail to address underlying risks.

Senate Minority Whip John Thune has indicated plans to revisit the bill, suggesting that further negotiations and revisions may be forthcoming. The ongoing debate highlights the need for a balanced approach that addresses both the opportunities and challenges presented by stablecoins and other digital assets. 

Conclusion

The GENIUS Act's failure to pass a key Senate vote reflects the intricate interplay of political, regulatory, and economic considerations surrounding cryptocurrency legislation. As digital assets continue to evolve and integrate into the financial system, lawmakers face the pressing task of crafting policies that safeguard the public interest while fostering innovation. The path forward will likely require renewed bipartisan collaboration, comprehensive stakeholder engagement, and a commitment to addressing the multifaceted dimensions of this emerging sector.

Writer @Erlin

Erlin is an experienced crypto writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides insights into the latest trends and innovations in the digital currency space.

 

 Check out other news and articles on Google News

Disclaimer:

The articles published on hokanews are intended to provide up-to-date information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended as an invitation to buy, sell, or invest in any assets. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making any investment or financial decisions.

hokanews is not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from the use of information provided on this site. Investment decisions should be based on thorough research and advice from qualified financial advisors. Information on HokaNews may change without notice, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the content published.